The founder of the Turkish Republic is often described as a dictator Essay

The founder of the Turkish Republic is often described as a potentate but was actually more like a latter-day king. (Andrew Ma - Essay ExampleA modern-day drawing card strives for greatness. Ataturk was the type of leader who needed to say something, stand by it and achieve it. A modern day leader does not in like manner accept the status quo that he/she found when they took the lead seat of their country however, they assume a forward momentum of driving their country forward. This was the kind of leader that Ataturk was. Modern-day kings also argue coherently and cohesively. In addition, it is the aim of this paper to praise Ataturk and not to upon him by referring to him as a dictator as other previous authors have done (Dogan 2003, p. 45 Huntington 2006, p. 34 Alayarian 2008, p. 56 Blythe 2000, p. 1). The paper will first offer a short account/ recital of his life and achievements, followed by my key purpose of studying the political legacy of Ataturk, as well as why I consid er that he is a particularly interesting and rare case of a constructive or kind dictator. His Achievements (Life and Military) Kemal Ataturk was born, in 1881, to a middle-class or average family in Salonica (Thessolaniki, Greece), in the world famous Ottoman Empire. His first bear on was Mustafa, but it is not known who gave him a wink name, Kemal. People argue that it is his teacher due to his excellence, or he/she valued to differentiate him from Mustafa (Mango 1999, p. 185). Others argue that the name was given to him by Ataturk himself following the release of a famous poem. All through his life, Ataturk gained the more honourific names of Pasha, Bey, Ghazi, as well as three years prior to his death, Ataturk, which stands for Father of the Turks. Critics argue that people poop attribute both the teenage Ataturks future military occupation and his modernising changes to the reality that his father had utilise him, at a young age, to the military and also sent him to a co ntemporarily secular school sort of of an Islamic madrassa (Mango 1999, p. 186). Also, Ataturk was enrolled in numerous military schools from 1893-1905, and went to be one of the Kingdoms best young military officers, at the status of Major (Kasaba 2008, p. 45). At times, secretly, Ataturk also took part in revolutionary groups, which wanted to reform the Kingdom. Ataturk effectively defended an Ottoman fortification in Libya all through the 1911-12 Italo-Turkish warfare, which was one of the very hardly a(prenominal) triumphs for the Turks against the advanced Italian forces. In 1912-13, Ataturk acquitted himself commendably once more in a losing battle in the Balkan warfare, where he was appointed to the Gallipoli peninsula, which also would motivate him for his next and more prominent role (Zurcher 1998, p. 33). During the First initiation War, wherein Ataturk individually opposed neutrality, he was the principal Turkish commander in the Gallipoli war (Mango, 1999, 186). This incompetent and unfortunate gamble by Winston Churchill led to a total of over 250,000 deaths on both sides Ottoman and Australian, British and New Zealand, respectively. Ataturk fruitfully revolted waves of Allied armies and caused a big defeat on the Allied armies. He also won a crucial victory for the Turkish citizens (Ahma 2003, p. 53). He used the rest of the war to pull in tactical triumphs in other regions of the Empire against British and Russian forces, in what were eventually a doom Central Powers and Ottoman war efforts that he had foreseen following a mid-war trip to